PR3: Transnational Private Regulation, Production Regimes and Power Resources

pr3_home.jpg
© Pixabay - Stokpic

SNF Project 2017-2020
Lead investigator: Prof. Jean-Christophe Graz (UNIL-IEPHI)

We explore the extent to which transnational private governance affects the capacity of workers to take collective action in pursuit of improvements in employment conditions in developing countries.

Transnational private labour regulation such as corporate codes of conduct and multi-stakeholder standards on labour, environment or human rights claim to respond to the governance deficits that have arisen as a result of the globalization of global production networks. Yet, little consensus exists about the effectiveness of their monitoring and enforcement practices or their ultimate impact.

We explore the extent to which transnational private governance affects the capacity of workers to take collective action in pursuit of improvements in employment conditions in developing countries.

Context
Since the 1990s, the concern has intensified about the responsibility of businesses in global subcontracting chains for exploitation of labour, inequality, and pollution. Many private transnational regulatory initiatives claim to address this concern by incentivizing multinational companies to voluntary sign up to human rights and environmental standards often referring to, for example, the International Labour Organization’s core labour standards. The effectiveness of this approach remains a complex and highly debated issue.

Over the last decade, scholars have studied the emergence, performance and problems related to transnational private labour regulation, their interactions on the transnational level and local level compliance. Stepping back from conventional debates on the overall effectiveness of transnational private governance, the project focuses instead on agency: the effect of transnational private labour regulation on the capacity of those involved, especially workers, to act in local contexts. With our project, we explore how different types of transnational private labour regulation, different national settings and different firm-level contexts of application combine to form what we call transnational hybrid production regimes.

Aim
The study examines how these regimes vary in the degree to which they support workers’ collective capacity to take action to improve their own conditions of employment. This is a cross country and cross sector study in Kenya and Brazil, based on a mixed method approach including ample field work and a survey of local actors.

The project tests two hypotheses. The hypothesis of institutional complementarity proposes that what is important for the impact of transnational private labour regulation on workers’ capacity to take
collective action is the interaction between the rights guaranteed by the transnational private regulatory initiative and existing local and national institutions. The hypothesis of production regime dependency proposes that different types of hybrid production regimes will provide more or less propitious contexts for worker’s collective action.

Follow us:  
Géopolis - CH-1015 Lausanne
Suisse
Tel. +41 21 692 31 60
Fax +41 21 692 31 45