Eco‑responsible  images

Image compression reduces page weight and loading times.

Read more about it

Search in

Evaluation of applications


 

When are applications evaluated?

Applications can be submitted throughout the year. The evaluation of submitted applications takes place once a month.

Who selects the applications?

A jury composed of two external experts to UNIL, selected from a pre-established list, is responsible for pre-evaluating the applications. 

The applications are analysed by the Vice-Rector in charge of teaching, who makes the final selection and ensures arbitration when the number of applications exceeds the available budget.

How are applications selected?

Anonymised applications are selected in 2 stages:

Pre-evaluation 

Each application submitted is reviewed by the pre-evaluation panel.

The evaluation takes place remotely on the platform and is based on an assessment grid. A report is drawn up for each application on the basis of the evaluations. The applications and the reports are then forwarded to the Vice-Rector in charge of teaching.

Final selection / arbitration 

The applications and the reports are analysed by the Vice-Rector in charge of teaching, which approves or rejects the projects. They also acts as referee if necessary, for example when the number of projects exceeds the available budget.

The final decision is sent to the project leader by e-mail, with a copy to the Faculty(ies)/School(s) concerned and to the head(s) of the central services involved.

Validated applications are forwarded to the CSE for administrative and financial management.

What are the project selection criteria?

Applications are analysed according to an evaluation grid containing the following criteria:

Pedagogical design

  • Relevance of the pedagogical intention and identified needs;
  • Clarity and relevance of the proposed pedagogical framework;
  • Potential to enhance the students' learning experience;
  • Potential for reuse of the pedagogical design;
  • Relevance of the project justification;
  • Clarity of the pedagogical design;
  • Relevance of the envisaged pedagogical methods.

Project management 

  • Clarity of the development stages of the project planning;
  • Consistency of the proposed budget;
  • Modalities for evaluating the impact of the project.